http://www.t-station.net/md_vs_all.html
excerpts:
MD Player's advantage over MP3 Player
1. MP3 has to be edited by computer. Very few solid state MP3 portables can execute real time recording. MD, on the other hand, can record from any source (digital/analog) through just an optic fiber, coax line, or microphone.
2. MP3's sound quality is far more inferior than MD. MP3 was develop to compress data at the ratio 1:10 ratio. MD's ATRAC technology, on the other hand, was developed for professional music industry and compress sound data in 1:5 ratio by eliminating noises and inaudible frequencies, preserving the dept of sounds. MiniDisc can actually sound better than a CD. MP3 cannot.
3. The various existing MD equipments, along with the removable colorful discs and labels, be can be easily individualized to show different personal styles. MP3s uses non-removable media, hard to be personalized.
4. MiniDisc equipments' accessories are easily and inexpensively obtained audio accessories whereas MP3 players require expensive computer accessories (such as RAM) for best performance.
It seems that MP3 can only remain as an audio entertainment when people turn on their computers. Solid MP3 players are not as durable and cool looking as MD players/recorders. Furthermore, one can copy all MP3s onto MiniDisc but not vice versa. Therefore, MD storm will, slowly but surely, progress toward the west.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
这个家伙很懒，什么也没留下......
422
0
其实我挺看好iPod， 容量大， 播放CD转换的WAV文件音质是绝对无损的。 但是它现在还不成熟， MP3的连续播放时间只有短短的8小时。 WAV文件的连续播放时间更是只有170分钟。等到Apple解决了耗电问题， 它对MD就有不小的威胁了
Innocence ppl brag about his nonsense.
